
Anke Rintlemann
April 2006
Procedure:
10 minced beef samples were
scanned with the Cropscan 2000. Sample 9 was very finely minced.
28.9 g of sample were weighed
out, wrapped in kling film and fitted into a 5 mm sample squeeze cell. 10 scans
were taken throughout the cell per sample.
Wet Chemistry was carried
out on those samples and the data file was used to assess suitability for
further calibration development using NTAS software. One sample was excluded
from the sample set, as the fat value appeared too low.

Figure 1: Absorption spectrum of mince beef samples

Figure 2: Calibration plot
for fat

Figure 3: Prediction plot
for fat
Discussion:
The calibration plot in Figure 2 shows good linearity and a reasonably good standard error of calibration considering the small sample set. The prediction mode was used to analyse the sample set against itself. The result can be seen in Figure 3. Again the linearity is good. The standard error of prediction is very good. The preliminary results indicate a promising basis for developing a robust calibration for mince beef.