NIR Technology Australia

 

 

Application Note 75: Analysis of Fat, Protein and Moisture in Sausage Meat Mixes Samples: Beef, Turkey, Pork and Chicken

 

Introduction:

 

NIR analysis of processed meat samples, eg, hot dog, corn dog, sausage mix, burger mix, turkey, ham and chicken mixes, is well established. This study demonstrates the ability of the Series 3000 Food Analyser (NIR Technology Australia, Bankstown, NSW, Australia), to be calibrated for fat, moisture and protein in meat mixes.

 

Description:

 

24 samples of processed meat mix were scanned in the transmission mode through a 14 mm thick layer of meat packed into a glass petri dish. Each sample was scanned 10 times to produce 240 NIT spectra from 720-1100nm. These spectra were imported into NTAS (NIR Technology Australia Software). A Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS) analysis was performed on the 240 spectra to develop calibration models for fat, moisture and protein. 6 more samples of meat mix were analysed using the calibrations developed. These samples were used as a validation set.

 

Results:

 

Figure 1. shows the NIT spectra of the 24 meat samples.

 

 

Figure 1. NIT Spectra of Meat Mixes

 

Figures 2, 3, and 4, shows the calibration plots for fat, moisture and protein.

 

 

Figure 2. Fat Calibration Plot

 

 

Figure 3. Moisture Calibration Plot

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Protein Calibration Plot

 

Prediction:

 

Figures 5, 6 and 7, shows the prediction plots for 6 samples of meat mix analysed using the Series 3000 Food Analyser and the reference or lab values.

 

 

Figure 5. Fat Prediction Plot

 

 

Figure 6. Moisture Prediction Plot

 

 

Figure 7. Protein Prediction Plot.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1. shows the results for calibration and prediction.

 

                                    Fat                   Moisture                       Protein

SEC                             .69                   .57                               .60

R2                                 .997                 .997                             .945

SEP                             .84                   .65                               .65

R2                                 .994                 .995                             .949    

 

Discussion:

 

Although the number of samples for calibration was only 24, the PLS calibration developed provided an adequate means of predicting further meat samples. To ensure the calibration is more robust, further samples should be added to the calibration set.