Suite 103, 56 Kitchener Pde Bankstown, NSW, 2200 Ph: 02 9708 5068 Fax: 02 9708 5537
NIR
Technology Australia
Application
Note 07: Determination of Ethanol Content in Water
Samples Using
a 38-element diode array detector NIR Transmission Instrument. April 2000
Introduction
This study was performed to evaluate the use of a
38-element silicon diode array NIR spectrophotometer to develop a rapid alcohol
analyser for potential use in the wine industry. The sampling procedure
involved the use of a liquid cell in transmission mode and the calibration
developed was tested for reproducibility, repeatability and temperature
stability.
Description
A preliminary calibration was developed using a set
of ethanol solutions made up to the concentrations listed in table 1 prepared
in Milli-Q water and buffered with 2.5g/L potassium hydrogen phthalate. Samples
were injected into a liquid cell with a pathlength of 30mm and scanned on a NIT
2000 near infrared transmission analyser in the wavelength range 720-1100nm The
calibration was optimised and tested for temperature stability with samples
equilibrated between 10 and 30oC. This temperature-stabilised
calibration was tested for temperature stability, reproducibility and
day-to-day repeatability.
Results
1)
Calibration
A preliminary calibration was developed using
Unscramber™. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated that in the alcohol
range 10-20%, there was a good cluster of spectral results. The calibration
statistics for the unstabilised
calibration are given in table 2.
Table
1:
Concentrations of alcohol samples for preliminary calibration
|
Sample |
Concentration
(%) |
Vol
EtOH required (ml) |
Mass
KHP (g) |
|
1 |
10.0 |
5.00 |
0.125 |
|
2 |
10.5 |
5..25 |
0.125 |
|
3 |
11.0 |
5.50 |
0.125 |
|
4 |
11.5 |
5.75 |
0.125 |
|
5 |
12.0 |
6.00 |
0.125 |
|
6 |
12.5 |
6.25 |
0.125 |
|
7 |
13.0 |
6.50 |
0.125 |
|
8 |
13.5 |
6.75 |
0.125 |
|
9 |
14.0 |
7.00 |
0.125 |
|
10 |
14.5 |
7.25 |
0.125 |
|
11 |
15.0 |
7.50 |
0.125 |
|
12 |
15.5 |
7.75 |
0.125 |
|
13 |
16.0 |
8.00 |
0.125 |
|
14 |
17.0 |
8.50 |
0.125 |
|
15 |
20.0 |
10.00 |
0.125 |
To test the temperature stability of this
calibration, standard alcohol samples were incubated at 10oC and
these samples were continuously measured on the spectrometer until the sample
temperature reached 30oC. Temperature was monitored using a
thermistor in direct contact with the solution. The results of these
experiments are shown in figure 1.
Table 2:
Statistics for the alcohol calibrations
|
|
Preliminary Calibration |
Temperature Stabilised Calibration |
|
Number of PC's |
5 |
5 |
|
Elements |
71 |
110 |
|
RMSED |
0.087 |
0.101 |
|
SED |
0.087 |
0.102 |
|
Slope |
0.999 |
0.998 |
|
Correlation |
0.999 |
0.999 |

Figure1:
Variation of predicted alcohol vs. temperature for a 10% and a 15% alcohol
standard.
Figure 1 indicates that the
predicted alcohol results vary linearly with temperature and therefore the
calibration needed to be corrected for temperature. This was achieved by adding
temperature stabilisation samples to the calibration. The statistics are also
shown in table 2.
2)
Temperature Stability
Figure 2 shows the
predictive ability of this calibration with a 13.5% alcohol standard in the
temperature range 22.0-30.5oC. Table 3 provides measures of the
accuracy, AAD and Standard Deviation for the temperature stability shown in
figure 2.
Table 3: Relevant statistics for calibration temperature stability
|
[ethanol] (%) |
NIR Predicted Alcohol (Avg) |
Std Deviation |
AAD (%)* |
|
13.50±0.1 |
13.45±0.1 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
*AAD (absolute Average Difference) between consecutive scans

Figure
2: Predictive ability vs. temperature for the stabilised calibration.
3)
Predictive Ability
Figure 3 shows the predictive
ability of the temperature stabilised calibration for the following ethanol
concentrations, 10.0%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%. All samples were
equilibrated to 24.0oC Relevant statistics are also given.

Figure 3: Predictive ability of the temperature stabilised calibration.
4)
Reproducibility/Repeatability
a)
Reproducibility
(between scans): See table 3.
b)
Reproducibility/Repeatability
(between refills). Table 4 shows the calibration performance between refills
and on a day-to-day basis
Table 4: Reproducibility/Repeatability Results
|
Sample |
Temp (oC) |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
|||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
|
Tap Water |
24.0 |
0.07 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
|
|
12.0% |
24.0 |
12.05 |
12.03 |
12.04 |
12.06 |
12.01 |
12.00 |
|
|
15.0% |
24.0 |
14.97 |
15.02 |
14.93 |
14.98 |
14.93 |
14.95 |
|
Reproducibility
AAD between sample refills =
0.03%
Std Dev =0.008%
Repeatability
AAD day-to-day = 0.02%
Conclusions
a)
The
38-element silicon diode array NIR instrument can be calibrated to measure
alcohol content of a set of ethanol standards.
b)
Temperature
stabilisation may be achieved within the calibration by the addition of samples
measured at the expected sample temperature extremes (i.e. 15-30oC).
c)
Reproducibility
and Repeatability on a day-to-day basis were found to be within specification
(i.e. Within ±0.1%).
d)
Although
the prediction of actual samples with the ethanol calibration was not
successful, the results indicate that the development of a red and a white wine
calibration is possible and on the basis of the results in this report, should
provide accurate prediction data.